It's Sha'Koris' LAW!

THE SHA'KORIS "PRIVATE" NATURAL PEOPLE SEEDLINGS" 

NON-DEROGABLE INTERNATIONAL

PRIVATE CORPORATION: ALL UNITED STATES

28 U.S.C. 3002.15(A)(B)(C), ET AL., ALL OTHERS, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES/

AGENTS, ET. AL., ALL OTHERS; NOTICE OF ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE. RESTRICTED.

DO NOT INTERROGATE. DO NOT DETAIN

NYSDOT NO. 70172400000112518857

TXDOT NO. 70181830000033526339 

​

"IS IT NOT WRITTEN IN MAN'S LAW?

​

• The United States U.S.C. 3002.15(A)(B)(C), et al., ALL Others, the government makes rules for the government NOT the people.      Article 1 Section 8 Clause 14; Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2.S.E.

• The United States U.S. 3002.15(A)(B)(C), et al., exercises exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District, NOT exceeding ten miles square...

      Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17

• A "Statute" WILL NOT be presumed to have extraterritorial effect... outside the [territorial] jurisdiction of the legislature          Bond v Jay, 7 Cranch 350, 3 L Ed 367

• A "Statute" is NOT LAW

     Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of                   Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d         244, 248

• A "Code" is NOT LAW                               In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261

• A  "Code" or "Statute" is NOT LAW          Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of               Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d         244, 248

• A concurrent or "joint resolution of legislature is NOT LAW

    Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179           N.E. 705, 707; Ward v. State, 176.         Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex       rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443,           110 P.2d 162, 165

NOTICED: ALL UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVITS RECORDED: TRAVIS, TEXAS COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE, STAND AS THE LAW OF THE LAND; BEING NATURAL LAW, TO WIT: ALL SHA'KORI NATION-STATE COMMONWEALTH PRIVATE SEEDLINGS [CITIZENRY] ARE TO BE JUDGED; THE SHA'KORI NATION-STATE COMMONWEALTH NATURAL LAW TRIBUNAL RETAIN INVIOABLE ABSOLUTE; AS WELL

EXCLUSIVE TERRITORIAL, JURISDICTIONAL,

JURIDICAL SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY OVER ITS DECLARED LANDS AND REPARTRIATED PRIVATE SEEDLINGS [CITIZENRY]; Hebrews 6:16-17

​

MAXIMS OF LAWS

​

• Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit

• An unrebutted affidavit  becomes the judgement

​

"IS IT NOT WRITTEN IN MAN'S LAW"

Unrebutted or uncontested affidavit Prima Evidence –"The FACTS deemed admitted!"

Meier v CIR, 199 F 2d 392, 396 (8th Cir.1952) quoting 20 Am Jur, Evidence Sec 190, page 193., United States vs. Kis, 658 F.2d, 526, 536-337 (7th Cir. 1981)

​

Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen. (Where private corporate [FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES] commercial paper and securities is concerned; Therewith, losings its sovereign status and becomes subject to the same laws as any other corporation. SUPREME COURT, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 US 36

    ___________________________________

​

NOTICED

​

THEIBARYATH ABAR'RISHONI AMURAKHAN FORCED DE JURE FOREIGN NATIONALS "PRIVATE SEEDLINGS" ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE UNITED STATES 28 U.S.C. 3002.15(A)(B)(C), ET AL., ALL OTHERS, ITS INSTRUMENTALITIES, INCLUSIVE OF ALL FOREIGN JUDICIARY, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES/AGENTS, ET AL., EXECUTIVE ORDERS, STATUTES, CODES, REGULATIONS, POLICIES, ET AL., ALL OTHERS;

​

"IS IT NOT WRITTEN IN LAW?"

​

STATUTES, CODES, RULES, REGULATIONS ARE NOT THE LAW OF THE LAND

​

• Bond v Jay, 7 Cranch 350, 3 L Ed 367). 

• Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248,

• Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248

• In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law,

• Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165

• Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)

• Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)

• Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261

• Lockard v. Los Angeles 33 Cal2d 553; Cert den 337 US 939

• Tot v United States, 319 US 463, 467; 63 S.Ct. 1241, 1245, 87 L.Ed.2d 1519 (1943).

• Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-60

• 16 Am Jur 2d 177, Late Am Jur 2d. 256

• Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945

• Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991

• American Jurisprudence 2nd 1964 vol. 16 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW § 177

• Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248

• In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261, in point of fact in Law

• Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165

• Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)

• Rodriques v Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor), 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985

• U.S. Const., Art. Vl, cl. 2; Maryland v Louisiana, 451 US 725; 746; 101 S Ct 2114; 68 L Ed 2d 576 (1981

• Lockard v. Los Angeles 33 Cal2d 553; Cert den 337 US 939.

• Tot v United States, 319 US 463, 467; 63 S.Ct. 1241, 1245, 87 L.Ed.2d 1519 (1943)

• 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256

• Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137

• Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180

Therewith, the United States 28 U.S.C. 3002.15(A)(B)(C), its instrumentalities, inclusive of ALL law enforcement, army, military agencies and agents; as well, corporations granted a license to conduct business on the Isles of Amuracas IbarYath Abar'Rishoni AmaruKhan InDios Territory, operate under the Natural Laws of the superior sovereign, Flag State: The Sha'Kori AyeliUdotlvsv Yi'SraeL;

To Wit: NO DEROGATION IS PERMITTED!

​

ALL FOREIGN AGENTS ARE COMMANDED TO IMMEDIATELY CONTACT:

The Sha'Kori AyeliUodtlvsv Yi'SraeL KaSiKa TzēKaDaH ShâBī CâdōChé: 516.670.2972 without hesitance and without the institution of any severities; inclusive but NOT limited to, RESTRICTED. DO NOT INTERROGATE. DO NOT DETAIN., kidnapping, arrest, fingerprinting, photographing, overtly/covertly taking of any DNA, chipping, tracking, wiretapping, surveillance, wire/mail fraud, et al., ALL OTHERS

​

CONCLUDING: ALL PRIVATESHA'KORI SEEDLINGS HATH BEEN REPATRIATED BACK TO THEIR TRIBE AND RIGHTFUL NATIONALITY; THERETO, ALL PRESUMPTION PERTAINING UNITED STATES CHATTEL PROPERTY-DEAD IN LAW, LOST AT SEA,  CITIZENSHIP HATH LAWFULLY BEEN REMOVED! 

​

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE: 

SHA'KORI AYELIUDOTLVSV YI'SRAEL KASIKA TZEDAKAH FOREWARNS IF BY CHANCE A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS' LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FINDS THEMSELVES IN THE EMBARRASSING  POSITION; HAVING UNLAWFULLY DETAINED AND/OR ARRESTED A SHA'KORI CITIZEN, PLEASE HAVE THE FOLLOWING LAWFUL DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE ON DEMAND:

​

1.SIGNED-WET INK WARRANT

2. JUDGES SIGNED AFFIDAVIT

3. INJURED PARTY/EYE WITNESS SIGNED-WET INK AFFIDAVIT

4. CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION THAT CREATED THE UNLAWFUL CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST ISSUED IN THE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST TO WHICH ANY OF OUR CITIZENRY ARE LAWFUL BENEFICIARIES.

​

1967, Also Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646: A "citizen of the United States" is a civilly dead entity operating as co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT "Private Constructive, Cestui Que Vie Trust of U.S., under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US, in Section 4.

​

ALL VIOLATORS SHALL BE SANCTIONED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AT THE MINIMUM OF ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS BACKED BY GOLD OR ACCEPTABLE SHA'KORI NATION-STATE CURRENCY, PER INFRACTION.

​

Is It Not Written In Man's Law 

​

The Supreme Court held that the American [AbOrigine] People are in FACT Sovereign and NOT the States or the Government. The Court went  on to define that local, state, and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions against the Sovereign People by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable; for their action;

• Bond v. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 - 2000 - Supreme Court- Cited by 761 litigants in other cases

• Bond v. US, 131 S. Ct. 2355-2011-Supreme Court - Cited by 306 

• Bond v. US, 1F.3d 631 - 1993 - Court of Appeals, 7th - Cited by 66